San Diego County is one of the least affordable places to live in America, and renters know it. When housing costs are high, people have less money to spend on other necessities such as food and medical care, which hurts their quality of life.
In 2017, 57 percent of the county’s renters were considered burdened by their housing costs, meaning they spent 30 percent or more of their income on rent and utilities. The figures come from data recently released by the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
The high cost of housing especially affects low- and middle-income families, who have less money to spend on food and other necessities.
The problem is even worse for the 28 percent of renters in the county who spent more than half their income on rent and utilities in 2017. People with higher rent burdens are more likely to skip doctor appointments and avoid paying for medications, and they are less likely to save money.
Share Of Income Spent On Rent In San Diego County In 2017. More than one-fourth of San Diego County renters spent 50 percent or more of their income on rent and utilities. See what percent of income people spent on their rent and utilities in 2017, according to the Census Bureau American Community Survey.
San Diego County’s homeowners have fared better since the 2007 recession than its renters. In the early 2000s, housing costs skyrocketed and it was easy for people to take out loans, even if they couldn’t pay them back.
“People didn’t care what their home payments were. … They would buy any house at any price because if they didn’t, that house will become more expensive,” said Mark Goldman, a real estate lecturer at San Diego State University.
In 2005, 50 percent of the county’s homeowners with mortgages were classified as “burdened” by their housing costs, according to Census data. That changed when the recession came.
The Federal Reserve lowered interest rates and home buyers had to prove they had enough income to repay their loans. Housing prices and mortgage rates tumbled. The cost of a 30-year mortgage reached an all-time low in 2012.
Homeowners could refinance their mortgages to these lower rates, cutting the amount they needed to spend on housing each month. By 2017, the number of San Diego County homeowners burdened by their housing costs dropped to 38 percent.
Housing Cost Burdens For Renters And Homeowners. People are considered burdened by their housing costs if they spend 30 percent or more of their income on rent. See what percent of renters and homeowners with mortgages are burdened by housing costs in San Diego County from 2005 to 2017, according to data from the Census Bureau American Community Survey.
And as homes became cheaper, more people bought them and turned them into rentals.
“During the housing bust years, we just saw a surge in the number of renter households that drove rental demand across the country, that pushed up rent and pushed downward rent affordability,” said Aaron Terrazas, senior economist at Zillow.
Rent burden is as much of a problem now as it was during the peak of the recession. The number of renters is on the rise, and the cost of renting continues to climb. The median gross rent in San Diego County in 2017 was $1,598.
Economists point to the housing shortage as the leading cause of high rents in the county and across California. The not-so-easy solution is to build more housing.
Incoming California Gov. Gavin Newsom wants developers to build half a million homes every year for the next seven years, more than six times what’s being built now.
Housing Cost Burdens For Renters And Homeowners. People are considered burdened by their housing costs if they spend 30 percent or more of their income on rent. See what percent of renters and homeowners with mortgages are burdened by housing costs in San Diego County from 2005 to 2017, according to data from the Census Bureau American Community Survey.
But San Diego County has been resistant to adding more housing. The county produced 4 percent fewer new housing units in 2017 than it did in 2016.
A central piece of San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer’s affordable housing plan was put on hold after labor unions and affordable housing advocates spoke out against it. The plan would have encouraged developers to build homes for middle-income families but included families of four with incomes as high as $120,000.
In November, Faulconer proposed a plan to let developers build new homes without parking spaces if they are within one-half mile of a transit stop.
“I think that the people who were concerned about the cost of housing should be showing up at planning meetings and zoning meetings, and speaking out to encourage higher density and faster approvals to get housing units online,” Goldman from SDSU said.
*************************************************************************************************
This article appeared originally in inewsource, which allowed The Grapevine to re-publish by permission. Jill Castellano is an investigative reporter and data analyst for inewsource. To contact her with tips, suggestions or corrections, please email jillcastellano [at] inewsource [dot] org.
Jill very good write up. I thought the information was well presented too. A few other aspects is NIBYism, gross fee requirements and regulation amongst other factors. Faulkners idea to allow no parking spaces is lunacy in a vehicle heavy state.